14/09/2020 Nvidia compra ARM por 40 mil milhões

A ARM Holding é neste momento para todos os efeitos uma empresa privada, propriedade da Softbank.

Para haver compra de posições na empresa, ou é negociado directamente com a Softbank ou terá de haver uma IPO.
 
E entretanto mais umas cambalhotas...

Three Major Arm Licensees Endorse the NVIDIA Takeover​

NVIDIA's $40 billion takeover of Arm Holdings plc from SoftBank, got a shot in the arm, as three major licensees of the IP came out in support of the bid. These include Broadcom, MediaTek, and Marvell Technology Group.
https://www.techpowerup.com/283902/three-major-arm-licensees-endorse-the-nvidia-takeover

Não deixa de ser curioso ver a Broadcom vir agora a público após a Qualcomm ter anunciado publicamente a sua oposição 😏
 
Como já tinha sido antecipado, agora o anúncio oficial


EU Commission announces in-depth investigation into NVIDIA case​

After a preliminary analysis, the EU executive announced on Wednesday (27 October) it will take a closer look at the $40 billion deal. The EU competition regulator fears the acquisition would enable NVIDIA to hurt its competitors by restricting access or imposing higher prices on the technology currently possessed by Arm.

“Our analysis shows that the acquisition of Arm by NVIDIA could lead to restricted or degraded access to Arm’s IP, with distortive effects in many markets where semiconductors are used,” said the EU’s competition chief Margrethe Vestager.
https://www.euractiv.com/section/di...nces-in-depth-investigation-into-nvidia-case/
 
Sim, foi a minha opinião de início, estava condenada ao fracasso.

Qualquer que fosse a desculpa, digo justificação, esbarrava em algo simples: há mais empresas a desenvolver chips próprios e não precisavam de ser donas da ARM Holdings.

A minha opinião inicial, corroborada pelo próprio JH, era que a Nvidia de certa forma estava a tentar estender o "reinado" do CUDA via ARM por causa do "ataque" da AMD (via HIP/ROCm) e da Intel (via OneAPI).
 
Não sei se isto é o melhor argumento :facepalm:

Nvidia Defends Arm Acquisition Deal: a ‘Once-in-a-Generation Opportunity’​


“Nvidia did not approach SoftBank to buy Arm,” the Nvidia filing continued. “Nvidia is a strong supporter of the x86 ecosystem and has developed accelerated computing platforms for x86 PCs and datacenters throughout its history.”
“The parties realized that Nvidia would be uniquely suited to help Arm create new IP and develop a world-class ecosystem that could stand as an alternative to x86, giving customers more choice and growing markets worldwide,”
“The decision’s logic and conclusions are flawed,” Nvidia said in its response. “First, the decision ignores competition from Intel in every relevant market. Antitrust law preserves competition – it does not empower customers and competitors with veto rights over acquisitions. The decision appears to lose sight of this fundamental principle, contending instead that if enough high-profile Arm customers object to the deal, the transaction must be anticompetitive and should be blocked. But even if some customers and competitors are unhappy with Arm’s plans, the transaction has no risk of foreclosing competition.”
“Deal opponents romanticize Arm’s past and either ignore or disparage Arm’s most powerful competition,” Nvidia continued. “But if Arm had market power, it would have sizable revenue growth and would be enormously profitable. Rejecting the prospect of any remedy, the [CMA] decision would not promote competition. Rather, it would prevent Arm from bringing competition into areas that have been long dominated by x86. The alternative outcome urged by deal opponents would result in a standalone, profit-maximizing business without any guarantees about licensing policy or investments. It would likely result in less investment in the U.K., less resources for Arm, less innovation, and less competition worldwide.”
https://www.hpcwire.com/2022/01/13/nvidia-defends-proposed-40b-arm-acquisition/
 

Nvidia Quietly Prepares to Abandon $40 Billion Arm Bid​

  • Company tells partners that it doesn’t expect deal to close
  • SoftBank, Arm’s current owner, looks at IPO for the business

Nvidia Corp. is quietly preparing to abandon its purchase of Arm Ltd. from SoftBank Group Corp. after making little to no progress in winning approval for the $40 billion chip deal, according to people familiar with the matter.

Nvidia has told partners that it doesn’t expect the transaction to close, according to one person, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private. SoftBank, meanwhile, is stepping up preparations for an Arm initial public offering as an alternative to the Nvidia takeover, another person said.

The purchase -- poised to become the biggest semiconductor deal in history when it was announced in September 2020 -- has drawn a fierce backlash from regulators and the chip industry, including Arm’s own customers. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission sued to stop the transaction in December, arguing that Nvidia would become too powerful if it gained control over Arm’s chip designs.

The acquisition also faces resistance in China, where authorities are inclined to block the takeover if it wins approvals elsewhere, according to one person. But they don’t expect it to get that far.

Both Nvidia and Arm’s leadership are still pleading their case to regulators, according to the people, and no final decisions have been made. And through it all, the companies have publicly maintained their commitment to the purchase.

“We continue to hold the views expressed in detail in our latest regulatory filings -- that this transaction provides an opportunity to accelerate Arm and boost competition and innovation,” Nvidia spokesman Bob Sherbin said.

“We remain hopeful that the transaction will be approved,” a SoftBank spokesperson said in an emailed statement.

If Nvidia manages to get the deal over the line, it would be a massive coup for Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang, who has built a graphics-card business into a chipmaking empire. Already, he’s sitting atop the most valuable U.S. company in the semiconductor industry, with a market capitalization of more than half a trillion dollars.

But it will be an uphill fight. Qualcomm Inc. pulled the plug on its $44 billion takeover of NXP Semiconductors NV in 2018 after nearly two years of regulatory hurdles.

The sale of Arm is under heavy scrutiny because its chip designs are used in everything from phones to cars to factory equipment, making neutrality the foundation of its business model. The world’s biggest tech companies rely on Arm technology, and they fear they could lose unfettered access under Nvidia.

Tech giants have lined up against the takeover. A group that includes Qualcomm, Microsoft Corp., Intel Corp. and Amazon.com Inc. have provided regulators around the world with what they believe is enough ammunition to kill the deal, according to people familiar with the process. In addition to needing approval in the U.S. and China, the Arm purchase needs clearance from the European Union and the U.K., both of which are studying the deal closely.

The ordeal has created divisions within Nvidia. Some people at the company are resigned to the acquisition’s defeat, but others think management could use the FTC trial to demonstrate the merits of the transaction.

The sale of Arm is under heavy scrutiny because its chip designs are used in everything from phones to cars to factory equipment, making neutrality the foundation of its business model. The world’s biggest tech companies rely on Arm technology, and they fear they could lose unfettered access under Nvidia.

Within SoftBank, there are factions that want to let the process play out -- especially since a gain in Nvidia’s stock price has made the transaction more valuable. Even after a recent tumble, Nvidia shares have nearly doubled since the Arm deal was announced. That’s added tens of billions of dollars to the initial $40 billion price tag.

Others at SoftBank would prefer to pursue an IPO for Arm sooner, while the chip industry is still considered attractive to investors. Already, concerns about a slowdown are growing.

The initial agreement between Nvidia and SoftBank expires Sept. 13 -- two years after it was forged -- but will automatically renew if approvals take longer. Nvidia said at the outset that closing the transaction would take “approximately 18 months.” That timeline would suggest completion around March of this year -- something that’s no longer likely.

The FTC lawsuit alone could take months. And the European Commission and the U.K.’s antitrust watchdog will have to weigh in.

SoftBank and Arm are entitled to keep $2 billion Nvidia paid at signing, including a $1.25 billion breakup fee, whether the deal goes through or not.

Nvidia also has to get signoff from Chinese authorities at a time when trade tensions are running high. The U.S. has sought to prevent China’s semiconductor industry from getting access to the latest technology. Many of the country’s fledgling chipmakers are Arm customers, giving Beijing extra incentive not to let the technology pass into U.S. ownership.

In arguing against the deal, companies like Qualcomm, Intel and Google have said that Nvidia can’t preserve Arm’s independence because it’s an Arm customer itself. Nvidia, the largest maker of graphics chips, competes with Intel in server processors and is expanding into new areas that would put it in direct competition with many other Arm licensees.

Nvidia also supplies chips to businesses such as Amazon’s AWS and Microsoft’s Azure, providing technology that handles artificial intelligence processing in data centers. Those companies also are developing their own chips, making Nvidia both a supplier and a potential rival.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...to-quietly-prepare-to-abandon-takeover-of-arm

Depois da queixa da FTC, era o esperado. A nVidia perde assim 2 mil milhões de $, da entrada no negócio e da penalização pela venda não se concretizar.

Agora será interessante ver o que é que a Softbank vai fazer à ARM. Parece que uma IPO poderá ser a alternativa.
 
Voltamos às minhas questões iniciais, o que impede os chineses de lançar uma OPA em bolsa?

A solução melhor parece-me ser a Softbank negociar tranches com algumas empresas que garantam estabilidade e um bloqueio a essa opção.
 
A compra teria que passar por compra conjunta entre Samsung, Qualcomm e Apple, ou assim.
A única a fazer algum sentido que podia comprar isoladamente a ARM era Qualcomm, cujo negócio maioritário é do licenciamento de IP.

Mas o que devia ser feito era compra conjunta de uns 3 grandes players, partes iguais, meter a ARM a dar algum lucro para se ir pagando, e evoluirem a arquitectura, com cada uma depois a continuar a fazer as suas próprias versões customizadas (ou não) de ARM, como até agora.
Se vai haver compra conjunta? Talvez nem 0.01% de hipótese..
 
Voltamos às minhas questões iniciais, o que impede os chineses de lançar uma OPA em bolsa?
As OPAs, tal como as IPOs, também têm que ser aprovadas. Depois de aprovadas, teriam ainda que convencer os accionistas a vender.
Além disso, há outros factores, como o de se ver onde ficaria cotada ou se haveria mais do que uma classe de acções, onde certas acções têm mais direitos que outras. Pode-se dar o caso de se ter uma grande % de uma empresa e não se ter grande poder.
Conclusão, depende de como as coisas ficam "blindadas". :)
A solução melhor parece-me ser a Softbank negociar tranches com algumas empresas que garantam estabilidade e um bloqueio a essa opção.
A compra teria que passar por compra conjunta entre Samsung, Qualcomm e Apple, ou assim.
Essa talvez fosse uma boa solução. Acho muito complicado a ARM ficar nas mãos de 1 só cliente. No entanto, essa solução levanta o problema se iria ser fácil dirigir uma empresa onde existiriam várias cabeças, muitas vezes com objectivos contrários.
A única a fazer algum sentido que podia comprar isoladamente a ARM era Qualcomm, cujo negócio maioritário é do licenciamento de IP.
A pensar assim, a Broadcom também seria uma hipótese, até porque a "actual" Broadcom andou anos a comprar empresas, entre elas a "original" Broadcom.
A questão é que ainda há pouco tempo a Qualcomm falhou a compra da NXP e a Broadcom falhou a compra da Qualcomm.
Os dois casos tiveram consequências e não sei se essas duas empresas vêm como sendo um objectivo "atingível" a compra da ARM.
 
@Nemesis11 sim a OPA também teria de ser "aprovada".
A questão é que durante esse tempo ficasse mais um ano ou ano e meio a ver navios.

Outra coisa é a OPA não atingir a totalidade do capital, mas ter capital suficiente para ter assento no CA e ter capacidade de bloqueio...

Do lote de interessados o menos interessado talvez até seja a Apple, pois não depende das arquitecturas que a ARM lance, o Core até será bastante agnóstico às ISA, se não der ARM v9.x, vão licenciar outra qualquer.

Eu não colocaria de parte a Intel, até porque se vai entrar no Foundry 2.0 quererá garantir clientes.
 
Isto não poderá ser um bluff da nvidia, para pressionar os accionistas a mexerem-se e darem a dica aos legisladores para aprovarem isto de uma vez...???
 
Porque é que a ARM devia ser comprada por um ou mais dos concorrentes que fabricam SoCs com a arquitetura?

O grande motivo pelo qual a ARM foi tão bem sucedida nos últimos 15 anos é porque a Softbank é um agente neutro e todos podem concorrer no mercado de forma justa.

Dar as chaves do castelo à Samsung seria tão mau quanto dar à Nvidia.
As outras empresas iriam eventualmente migrar para RISC-V mas entretanto perdíamos anos na adaptação e perda de compatibilidade de binários legacy.
 
O governo Inglês não iria permitir a venda à Samsung ou a outra qualquer empresa fora do espaço europeu. Metam isso na cabeça. Mais do que uma questão de competitividade é uma questão de soberania e segurança nacional.

Só com garantias muito sólidas a esse nivel é que uma eventual venda pode ir para a frente.
 
E que empresas europeias seriam essas?

A maior empresa de semicondutores europeia é a Infineon, a segunda a STMicro, e não estou a ver o interesse de nenhuma delas.

Dado que o RU não tem nenhuma, reatam as empresas de defesa (BAE, Thales) ou financeiras.

Uma coisa é certa, a Softbank tem um problema para resolver, tem de vender para tapar o buraco de outros investimentos.
 
Back
Topo