A Trident tb foi apanhada nas "teias" do cheating!
- Autor do tópico SoundSurfer
- Data Início
Da Profezzur
Power Member
MUAHAHAHAHAHA
Nemesis11
Power Member
http://www.spodesabode.com/content/article/trident
Acho que o gráfico diz tudo.....
Parece um comentário daquele ministro iraquiano......
Acho que o gráfico diz tudo.....
Parece um comentário daquele ministro iraquiano......
:die: 
Nemesis11
Power Member
Mas no caso da ATI é discutivel se é cheat ou não.....
Mas ok, eles admitiram que iam tirar aquilo nos proximos drivers.
Também é condenavel, mas não é comparavel.
Mais condenavel foi o cheat quack/quake.
Agora o cerne da questão, se não compramos ATi ou nVidia, compramos o que? SIS??
Mas ok, eles admitiram que iam tirar aquilo nos proximos drivers.
Também é condenavel, mas não é comparavel.
Mais condenavel foi o cheat quack/quake.
Agora o cerne da questão, se não compramos ATi ou nVidia, compramos o que? SIS??
Última edição:
WarLock
Power Member
voçes ainda nao perceberam que toda a gente na industris seja ela qual for faz "atalhos" como lhe chama o outro de uma maneira ou outra
que toda a industria faz campanhas para os comerciais de forma a melhor atacar ou causar desinformação em relação a outras marcas.
http://www.warp2search.net/article.php?sid=12550&mode=thread&order=0
Rancho*: It just looks like, that benchmarking the way we used to, is more than obsolete. When Degger* first posted this, I remembered a german article posted some days back in mid May. I didn't bother about it too much because I thought Trident's market share was way too low to be of any interest to our readers. But recent developments in the industry force the media, semi professional reviewers and also end users to change their point of view on established benchmarking solutions currently available. There is some small hope that I put into RightMark3D, an open source benchmark approach. However real word applications will be what we have to look for in performance evaluation of graphics chips in the future.
The Trident article was posted by Chip.de, Germany's largest online IT portal. The Toshiba Tecra M1 notebook uses an Trident XP4m32 graphics chip that produces inflated benchmarks in 3DMark2K1SE. Once you renamed the 3DMark.exe file, scores dropped more than 50%!
The exploit revealed to the public by The Tech-Report using 3DMark03 and Nvidia graphics cards functions in the same way. Thanks to Thorz for the submission.
If you're old like me, you may remember the day when ATI was caught optimizing its Radeon 8500 drivers for Quake III Arena timedemos. The trick was simple: ATI's drivers looked for an executable named "quake3.exe" and turned down texture quality when "quake3.exe" started. Kyle Bennett at the cold, HardOCP renamed "quake3.exe" to "quack3.exe" and ran some benchmarks. ATI was busted.
afinal havia outra
lol
que toda a industria faz campanhas para os comerciais de forma a melhor atacar ou causar desinformação em relação a outras marcas.
http://www.warp2search.net/article.php?sid=12550&mode=thread&order=0
Rancho*: It just looks like, that benchmarking the way we used to, is more than obsolete. When Degger* first posted this, I remembered a german article posted some days back in mid May. I didn't bother about it too much because I thought Trident's market share was way too low to be of any interest to our readers. But recent developments in the industry force the media, semi professional reviewers and also end users to change their point of view on established benchmarking solutions currently available. There is some small hope that I put into RightMark3D, an open source benchmark approach. However real word applications will be what we have to look for in performance evaluation of graphics chips in the future.
The Trident article was posted by Chip.de, Germany's largest online IT portal. The Toshiba Tecra M1 notebook uses an Trident XP4m32 graphics chip that produces inflated benchmarks in 3DMark2K1SE. Once you renamed the 3DMark.exe file, scores dropped more than 50%!
The exploit revealed to the public by The Tech-Report using 3DMark03 and Nvidia graphics cards functions in the same way. Thanks to Thorz for the submission.
If you're old like me, you may remember the day when ATI was caught optimizing its Radeon 8500 drivers for Quake III Arena timedemos. The trick was simple: ATI's drivers looked for an executable named "quake3.exe" and turned down texture quality when "quake3.exe" started. Kyle Bennett at the cold, HardOCP renamed "quake3.exe" to "quack3.exe" and ran some benchmarks. ATI was busted.
afinal havia outra
lol
Nemesis11
Power Member
Sempre houve outra.....
Quando a ATI foi apanhada até se fizeram programas para renomear strings de Quake para quack.
Parece que a unica que escapa é a Matrox ( essa nem com cheats lá vai
).
A SIS tb tem o caso do "turbo mode". Para quem já viu.
Por default vem a 3. Ela até é +/- rápida, mas a imagem fica um m****. Até à pouco tempo só se podia alterar este valor no regestry. Metia-se a 1 e a performance ficava um treta.
Quando a ATI foi apanhada até se fizeram programas para renomear strings de Quake para quack.
Parece que a unica que escapa é a Matrox ( essa nem com cheats lá vai
).A SIS tb tem o caso do "turbo mode". Para quem já viu.
Por default vem a 3. Ela até é +/- rápida, mas a imagem fica um m****. Até à pouco tempo só se podia alterar este valor no regestry. Metia-se a 1 e a performance ficava um treta.