Optik1
Power Member
Sempre pensei que os AMD 64 venice (3000+,3200+,3500+) tinham as mesmas capacidades de overclock, depois de ler isto:
"When we tested the 3500+ we had pretty good success with a 25% overclock to 2.75GHz, and a stable 22.5% overclock to 2.7GHz. Now with the 3200+ we were able to reach the same speeds of 2.75GHz or a 37.5% overclock, and a 2.7GHz or 35% overclock with stability. This would point to a top MHz for initial Venice cores with mid range cooling at around 2.7GHz to 2.8GHz. Of course you enjoy the advantages of SSE3, better memory compatibility, and the low operating temperature which is what we really love. The 3200+ when overclocked also enjoys a better top memory bandwidth score, and a lower price."
http://amdpower.altervista.org/index.php?action=fullnews&showcomments=1&id=536
Parece confirmar o minha suspeita, alguem testou, oveclokou, ou sabe as diferenças entre estes cpu's a nivel de OC?
"When we tested the 3500+ we had pretty good success with a 25% overclock to 2.75GHz, and a stable 22.5% overclock to 2.7GHz. Now with the 3200+ we were able to reach the same speeds of 2.75GHz or a 37.5% overclock, and a 2.7GHz or 35% overclock with stability. This would point to a top MHz for initial Venice cores with mid range cooling at around 2.7GHz to 2.8GHz. Of course you enjoy the advantages of SSE3, better memory compatibility, and the low operating temperature which is what we really love. The 3200+ when overclocked also enjoys a better top memory bandwidth score, and a lower price."
http://amdpower.altervista.org/index.php?action=fullnews&showcomments=1&id=536
Parece confirmar o minha suspeita, alguem testou, oveclokou, ou sabe as diferenças entre estes cpu's a nivel de OC?
