muddymind
1st Folding then Sex
Está disponível o fix do preferred core no W11: https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/download-amd-ryzen-chipset-drivers-3-10-08-506.html
https://www.computerbase.de/2021-10...amds-zen-3-workstation-cpu-chagall-gesichtet/In the HEDT segment, AMD has no pressure to act. Threadripper is the sole entertainer there, a competitor, if at all, far from in sight. In view of the tight supply situation, the company seems to be setting its priorities differently, which is why a normal threadripper - the last generation started in November 2019 - has been pushed back steadily and may now even be deleted from the list. A Pro model for the workstation market is still to come, but basically these are Epyc processors with a different name.
- Ubuntu 20.04 LTS server as the current long-term stable release used in the enterprise. Ubuntu Server 20.04.3 LTS sticks to using the original Linux 5.4 kernel and other non-HWE packages by default.
- Ubuntu 21.04 as the non-LTS release that debuted shortly after the EPYC Milan launch.
- Ubuntu 21.10 as the recently released non-LTS Linux distribution for those wondering the current out-of-the-box performance for AMD EPYC servers on this release, which is also now just six months before Ubuntu 22.04 LTS.
- Ubuntu 21.10 with upgrading to Linux 5.15 Git for the very latest kernel version nearing its official release in the coming weeks.
This round of Ubuntu Linux benchmarking was carried out on an ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T currently being reviewed at Phoronix with an AMD EPYC 74F3 24-core frequency-optimized Zen 3 server processor with 8 x 8GB DDR4-3200 memory.
80 tests were run across the four tested Ubuntu Linux configurations. Ubuntu 21.10 (with either its stock Linux 5.13 kernel or the upgrade to Linux 5.15) represented 80% of the wins with fortunately no major performance regressions found during the testing.
Não se esqueçam deste evento que segundo o YouTube é transmitido às 16h de cáNa segunda feira deveremos ter a apresentação dos epyc com 3d vcache
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/a...cache-brings-up-to-768mb-of-l3-cache-64-coresThe stacked L3 cache adds roughly ~10% to overall latency, which is comparable to the standard latency impact from simply adding capacity with standard on-die techniques. That's partly because the additional L3 cache slice is somewhat 'dumb' — all the control circuitry resides on the existing CCD, which helps reduce the latency overhead. In addition, because the larger cache reduces trips to main memory due to higher L3 cache hit rates, the additional capacity relieves bandwidth pressure on main memory, thus reducing latency and thereby improving application performance from multiple axes.