-----Original Message-----
From: "Mike" <***********@theinquirer.net>
To: <********@zmail.pt>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:11:14 +0100
Subject: RE: Xtremesystems claims record for Athlon 64
> Damnit... I must learn to spell. Off to fix again
>
> m
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nuno Ribeiro [mailto:*******@zmail.pt]
> Sent: 27 September 2004 20:51
> To: Mike Magee
> Subject: RE: Xtremesystems claims record for Athlon 64
> Importance: High
>
>
> Hi again
>
> Just one more
>
> The forum is not www. techzone.pt but
www.techzonept.com
>
> Thanks for the credits for |RickY| and Pedro Rocha,
>
> Nuno Ribeiro
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "******" <*********@theinquirer.net>
> To: <*******@zmail.pt>
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:15:51 +0100
> Subject: RE: Xtremesystems claims record for Athlon 64
>
> > Fixed now
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nuno [mailto:*****@zmail.pt]
> > Sent: 27 September 2004 19:11
> > To:
[email protected]
> > Subject: Xtremesystems claims record for Athlon 64
> > Importance: High
> >
> >
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > I am writting because I read your article and I must point one
> > correction that should be done: you wrote "At Xtreme Systems,
> > notable for its earlier success in pushing the Prescott to the
> > limit using liquid nitrogen, there's also a report that the chaps
> > have clocked the Athlon 64 to unholy GHz heights too, without too
> > much bother or fash. You can find that report, here. And they say
> > megahurts don't matter." when in reallity the high clock in the
> > A64 was obtained by two portuguese fellows, nicknamed |RickY| and
> > Pedro Rocha, who are frequent users of a portuguese forum -
> >
www.techzonept.com and they also reported the fact on
> > Xtremesystems forums.
> >
> > Thus, the score was not obtained by Xtremesystems but related
> there.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Nuno Ribeiro