Comprar Objectiva

[JPgod]

Por este orçamento, até podes pensar na 70-200 F4.0 L IS USM

As F 2.8 que já ultrapassam os 1000 €, mas para ciclismo não é essencial. Como foi dito, ciclismo ocorre em condições boas de luminosidade, logo F 4.0 dá para o gasto.

De qualquer forma, uma L séries é sempre boa

Já agora, onde arrumar a branquinha EF 70-200mm f/4L USM -519€ a este preço, é que assim ficava logo na minha ToDo List

 

[Rui Marto]

Eu estive a pensar na F2.8 usada por 820€... Mas só ganho um stop e com esse dinheiro compro a F4 IS. (espero eu)

 

[MasterChief]

Tens esta review sobre a EF 70-300. Falam bem da lente.

Verdict

The performance of the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 USM IS came as a total surprise. Unlike its predecessor the lens is capable to produce a very high performance throughout the zoom range without the significant drop in quality at 300mm typical for most consumer grade lenses in this range. It seems as if the new UD element helps to lift the optical quality significantly. Distortions, CAs as well as vignetting are also very respectable. So in terms of optical quality the EF 70-300mm IS can be almost described as a hidden Canon L lens. As much as it may promise here its build quality remains in line to what you can expect from a consumer grade lens and the small max. aperture is limiting its scope specifically regarding portraits where you seek for a pronounced fore-/background blurr only possible via large apertures (f/2.8 and larger). However, if you're looking for a very good, light-weight tele zoom e.g. for travel photography this lens should be high on your shopping list.

http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/canon_70300_456is/index.htm

 

[Rui Marto]

Já li reviews a dizer o mesmo da 17-85mm F/4-5.6 IS USM e no entanto não me parece verdade. O mesmo pode acontecer com esta. Comparem mesmo as imagens para se certificarem.