At Intel Developer Forum 2006 the journalists obtained the long-anticipated Conroe processors and tested them in a number of applications and benchmarks 4 months before their official announcement. In particular, they compared Conroe 2.67 MHz and AMD Athlon FX 60 overclocked to 2.8 GHz (an analog of FX 62). Motherboards were, respectively, a modified Intel D975XBK and DFI RD480. 1GB of DDR2 operated at 4-4-4 and 2-2-2/1T (DDR) respective timings. Also, both systems had "CrossFired" Radeon X1900 XT and Windows XP.
Multimedia encoding:
Windows Media Video 9:
Unreal Tournament 2004 Bot Patch (1024*768):
Source: anandtech
Multimedia encoding:
Windows Media Video 9:
- AMD Athlon FX60, 2.8 GHz - 1 minute 15 seconds;
- Intel Conroe, 2.67 GHz - 1 minute 6 seconds.
- AMD Athlon FX60, 2.8 GHz - 1 minute 42 seconds;
- Intel Conroe, 2.67 GHz - 1 minute 27 seconds.
- AMD Athlon FX60, 2.8 GHz - 44 seconds;
- Intel Conroe, 2.67 GHz - 31 seconds.
Unreal Tournament 2004 Bot Patch (1024*768):
- AMD Athlon FX60, 2.8 GHz - 159,64fps;
- Intel Conroe, 2.67 GHz - 186,95fps.
- AMD Athlon FX60, 2.8 GHz - 226,4fps;
- Intel Conroe, 2.67 GHz - 278,1fps.
- AMD Athlon FX60, 2.8 GHz - 112,67fps;
- Intel Conroe, 2.67 GHz - 140,02fps.
- AMD Athlon FX60, 2.8 GHz - 193fps;
- Intel Conroe, 2.67 GHz - 281fps.
- AMD Athlon FX60, 2.8 GHz - memory 4468;
- Intel Conroe, 2.67 GHz - memory 5504;
- AMD Athlon FX60, 2.8 GHz - CPU - 5548;
- Intel Conroe, 2.67 GHz - CPU - 6755.
Source: anandtech