Nemesis11
Power Member
Suse 9.1 64 bit. Xeon 3.6 Vs Athlon 3500.
Devia ser um Opteron ou um PIV F que deviam estar ali, mas o Xeon tem a vantagem do dual channel, mas as mems são "Registered CL3".
http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2158
Ouch!!!
Devia ser um Opteron ou um PIV F que deviam estar ali, mas o Xeon tem a vantagem do dual channel, mas as mems são "Registered CL3".
http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2158
Although the Athlon 64 3500+ and the Xeon 3.6GHz EM64T processors were not necessarily designed to compete against each other, we found that comparing the two CPUs was more appropriate than anticipated, particularly in the light of Intel's newest move to bring EM64T to the Pentium 4 line. Once we obtain a sample of the Pentium 4 3.6F, we expect our benchmarks to produce very similar results to the 3.6 Xeon tested for this review.
Without a doubt, the 3.6GHz Xeon trounces over the Athlon 64 in math-intensive benchmarks. Intel came ahead in every severe benchmark that we could throw at it, particularly during John the Ripper. Even though John uses several different optimizations to generate hashes, in every case, the Athlon chip found itself at least 40% behind. Much of this is likely attributed to the additional math tweaking in the Prescott family core.
Ouch!!!