This isn’t a great setup for me because I don’t like Apple’s earbuds. They don’t fit my ears well and, as a result, I’m not thrilled with their sound. It’s possible Apple will provide some kind of adapter so that you can use third-party headphones with the new shuffle—the company told Macworld’s Jim Dalrymple that such an adapter will be available—but then you’re likely looking at another $19 for the adapter because Apple seems to believe that the least amount it can charge for an accessory is $19. If so, your $79 shuffle is now a $99 shuffle. At that point, I’d cough up the extra $50 for an iPod nano, which not only lets me navigate the device with a click wheel, but bears a screen, plays movies, has twice the capacity, and isn’t so small that I’m likely to put it through the wash.
But I’m not the target buyer for this device. If you walk along any city street, ride a subway or bus, or wander through the local gym, you’ll see that nearly everyone uses the stock Apple earbuds. It’s not that their ears are any more ideal for these things than mine, it’s just that most people don’t care or know any better. This is what I got, this is what I’ll use.
And they’ll be just as happy to use the shuffle as it was intended. Load it with music, jam in the earbuds, press the remote button, and rock on. As for me and others like me, we’re thinking not only about third-party headphones, but how we’re going to plug this shuffle into our car or home stereos.
Português de Portugal!!! só por isso já merecia ser comprado!
Gostei do bixinho.
Os fones da Apple são assim tão maus? É que eu usava-os no meu touch, mas ontem estragaram-se com um pequeno acidente e fui comprar uns da Sennheiser. A diferença não é assim tanta... Não concordo quando colocam os fones da Apple como os piores alguma vez feitos. Está bem que não são os melhores, longe disso, mas cumprem bem a sua função a não ser que vocês queiram ficar surdos
Quanto ao shuffle, é um leitor bastante interessante. Não fosse assim tão caro e eu comprava-o
E já experimentaste os fones do shuffle no iphone, e os do iphone no shuffle?Não sei... os meus phones do iphone são muito melhores que os phones do meu shuffle 2g. Alias não conseguia correr ou ouvir musica com os phones do shuffle e com o iphone é sem stress´s....
Given the shuffle's obvious limitations, one might expect it to be fairly cheap. But this is Apple, so it's not. The latest shuffle will cost you a cool $80, which is nearly double the price of a 4GB Sansa Clip that has not only a screen, but proper controls that won't limit your headphone options. Why anyone looking for a new MP3 player would even consider the shuffle is beyond me. Perhaps that's because the shuffle isn't just an MP3 player. According to Apple, it's a "fashion tech-cessory," which presumably makes it OK to sacrifice functionality, usability, and value in pursuit of smaller, sleeker form factors. This isn't just an MP3 player for the gym; it's an MP3 player for people who put on make up and only the most fashionable workout attire to be seen at the gym, and that's what makes the new shuffle the quintessential Apple product.
http://www.techreport.com/discussions.x/16571
Alguém pode contrariar este argumento?
Isto é, se este leitor Mp3 fosse um zune, compravam?
É caro, sem dúvida, mas se calhar o que pagas a mais, ganhas em sincronização, ergonomia, peso, dimensões e durabilidade (embora este último seja sempre relativo, mas pelo menos falo daquilo que tenho experiência).Se é caro? Sim, deveria custar 50 euros, máximo.
Qual é o material deste shuffle? Continua a ser plástico?