nVidia lança drivers para 3DMark 2k3!

LOL!

Lab Report - Conclusion

"3DMark03 has combined some pretty artwork into a set of four nice demo scenes. But, these scenes are so distant from real game applications that 3DMark03 just doesn't make it as a benchmark. Lacking any similarity to actual games, it misrepresents the gaming experience, and doesn't arm the consumer with the right information to make a purchase decision. It also forces hardware vendors to waste valuable engineering resources focusing on artificially fabricated cases that will never benefit real games. In the end, the consumer loses. So, where do you find a true gamers' benchmark? How about running actual games? Most popular games include a benchmark mode for just this purpose. Doom3, Unreal Tournament 2003, and Serious Sam Second Encounter are all far better indicators of current and upcoming game performance. And, because the vendors of these games have licensed their game engines to other game developers, you can expect that the next generation of games will have these game engines at their core. Today's consumers no longer have to rely on artificial attempts at mimicking games. In most cases, consumer's favorite games already have a ready-made benchmark built right in."

White Paper - Conclusion

"Over the last four years, 3DMark has become a trusted standard in 3D graphics benchmarking. Futuremark’s latest version, 3DMark03, continues the tradition of providing an easy-to-use tool for benchmarking nextgeneration 3D graphics technology. This time, powered by the latest DirectX 9 features and supporting graphics hardware, we showcase 3D graphics likely to be seen over the next year and a half. More importantly we provide a neutral and transparent benchmarking tool to allow the user to evaluate the capabilities of the latest hardware. We have added new functionality, such as the 3D sound test, a set of new feature tests and much improved image quality tools, to allow the user to isolate performance of key parts of 3D graphics usage. As graphics hardware becomes more powerful, especially with new sophisticated shader support, stunning 3D graphics will become accessible to more applications. We believe 3DMark03 will serve as a highly dependable tool for the benchmarking professional in this new environment."


E saquem o driver porque já ouvi dizer que corre o Mother Nature na GF4 Ti.


Isto já é pior que o 3D Analyze.
 
:-D

a nvidia realmente rula em drivers vai fazer desbrotar pixel shader 2.0 nas GF4 ---> I dont think so


sonha com o mother nature suportado nas gf4
 
Última edição:
não sei porque mas cheira-me que se a Ati quiser tmb faz uns drivers que boostam o 3dmark03 :rolleyes:

Que atitude hipocrita falam mal do bench e depois fazem uns drivers a pressa que boostam nele ... (save face)

benchs nessa treta de 3dmark valem não valem 1 .\.


Já bencharam no 3dmark03 a 320x200 ? :-D UMA RESOLUÇÃO DO FUTURO :rolleyes:

(no 2k1 a res minima era 640x480 , tanta treta de features de alta qualidade no 03 e permitem benchar a 320x200...)

o AF a 4x a 320x200 rulaaaaa tanto ... :-D

coisa que eu mais adoro e ver pessoal a enfiar os pés pelas mãos nas cantigas dos PDFs :-D


a 320x200 tenho exactamente os mesmos fps minimos que a 1024x768 e que a 1.9ghz ou a 2.4ghz no mother nature ou seja não percebo que se é a grafica ou o sistema que esta atrofiando aquilo ....

------> pode se concluir que o 3dmark03 rula pra tirar conclusões
 
Back
Topo