1. Este site usa cookies. Ao continuar a usar este site está a concordar com o nosso uso de cookies. Saber Mais.

Ping 82.102.28.193 -n 10

Discussão em 'Sugestões e Questões Relativas ao Fórum' iniciada por Lostctrl, 12 de Fevereiro de 2005. (Respostas: 45; Visualizações: 2006)

  1. Lostctrl

    Lostctrl [email protected] Member

    Ping no novo servidor com TVTEL 512/128

    Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=56

    Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 66ms, Average = 56ms

    Bem melhor agora...
     
  2. NPinho

    NPinho I folded Myself

    Que POWER:

    NETVISAO 1024/256

     
    Última edição: 12 de Fevereiro de 2005
  3. Xpirit

    Xpirit Banido

    Não está mau, não.

    PING 82.102.28.193 (82.102.28.193) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=22.7 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=11.8 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=12.7 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=6.60 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=15.9 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=5.19 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=8.10 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=11.9 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=10.0 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=10 ttl=58 time=46.9 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=11 ttl=58 time=4.53 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=12 ttl=58 time=11.4 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=13 ttl=58 time=9.33 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=14 ttl=58 time=8.09 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=15 ttl=58 time=9.68 ms
    64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=16 ttl=58 time=6.68 ms
     
  4. Chip

    Chip Zwame Advisor

    O servidor está numa infraestrutura com acesso ao gigapix

    para já tem poucos users online

    a ver vamos como se comporta quanto tiver mais cheio
     
  5. tonipig

    tonipig I fold therefore I AM

    Netcabo 2Mbs

    A enviar para 82.102.28.193 com 32 bytes de dados:

    Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=55ms TTL=57
    Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=50ms TTL=57
    Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=24ms TTL=57
    Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=17ms TTL=57
    Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=14ms TTL=57
    Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=18ms TTL=57
    Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=13ms TTL=57
    Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=11ms TTL=57
    Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=10ms TTL=57
    Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=19ms TTL=57

    Estatísticas de ping para 82.102.28.193:
    Pacotes: Enviados = 10, Recebidos = 10, Perdidos = 0 (perda: 0%),
    Tempo aproximado de ida e volta em milissegundos:
    Mínimo = 10ms, Máximo = 55ms, Média = 23ms
     
  6. DaMan

    DaMan Power Member

    A maneira correcta de fazer isso é start > run > Ping www.techzonept.com -n10 certo? A janela fecha-se depois do teste. HELP.
     
  7. NPinho

    NPinho I folded Myself


    nao... em vez de www.techzonept.com, mete 82.102.28.193, que é o IP do server onde esta alojada a TZ
     
  8. Peterwolf

    Peterwolf Power Member

    DaMan, a maneira correcta é ir a execurar > escrever cmd > e ai escrever ping 82.102.28.193 -n10

    Abraços
     
  9. Chip

    Chip Zwame Advisor

    dividi a thread em duas, uma para o antigo host, que ainda tá online e outra (esta) para este.
     
  10. Kermit the frog

    Kermit the frog I quit My Job for Folding

    Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=58

    Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 15ms, Maximum = 28ms, Average = 19ms

    -----

    Netvisao 1mb :)
     
  11. PSICO

    PSICO Power Member

    Ha...!!!
    Os meus pings estão na casa dos 183ms


    :eek:
     
  12. Chip

    Chip Zwame Advisor

    Tas a pingar do sabão-rosa??? :D (private joke)

    pingaste para o ip.. antes ou depois de desligares a mula? :D

    Ou então é a tua vizinhança que distrai os bits :D Ouvi dizer que tens uma vizinha jeitosa :P Onde é que ela se meteu hoje que não a vi? :D
     
  13. Napalm_Death

    Napalm_Death Power Member

    sapo pro
    e com emule a bombar ao max!
    mas tenho cfosspeed ;)
     
  14. JuSt_Me_AnD_yOu

    JuSt_Me_AnD_yOu What is folding?

    Netvisao 256

    Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=58

    Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 18ms, Maximum = 23ms, Average = 18ms
     
  15. Sacripanta

    Sacripanta SuperModeradorzinho
    Staff Member

    Vamos a calar.. :D
     
  16. Kermit the frog

    Kermit the frog I quit My Job for Folding

    Respekt your AUTORITAH?! :x2: I WONT!!!!!!
     
  17. BonJouR

    BonJouR [email protected] Member

    Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52

    Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 59ms

    -/-

    C:\Documents and Settings\Rui Marto>tracert 82.102.28.193

    Tracing route to 82.102.28.193 over a maximum of 30 hops

    1 16 ms 15 ms 17 ms bl3-16-1.dsl.telepac.pt [213.13.16.1]
    2 16 ms 15 ms 15 ms dial-b1-170-46.telepac.pt [194.65.170.46]
    3 14 ms 15 ms 15 ms lcatrt2.telepac.net [213.13.135.58]
    4 16 ms 15 ms 15 ms falcao.telepac.net [213.13.135.162]
    5 15 ms 36 ms 19 ms 194.65.9.2
    6 18 ms 23 ms 36 ms fa0-0-ar2.lis.router.colt.net [80.251.166.219]
    7 60 ms 60 ms 58 ms 80.251.161.178
    8 57 ms 62 ms 60 ms sonet-gw.cpe.NFSi.pt [82.102.1.38]
    9 59 ms 58 ms 58 ms rtr3.core.Lisboa.AS31668.Sonet [82.102.31.195]
    10 61 ms 60 ms 60 ms 82.102.28.193

    Trace complete.


    Sapo Pro (1024/256Kbps).

    Bem melhor, sem dúvida :D
     
    Última edição: 12 de Fevereiro de 2005
  18. Sonas

    Sonas Power Member

    Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59

    Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 14ms

    not bad not bad :D
     
  19. BonJouR

    BonJouR [email protected] Member

    Já agora:

    C:\Documents and Settings\Rui Marto>ping 82.102.28.193 -n 10

    Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=59
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=59

    Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 35ms, Average = 18ms

    -/-

    C:\Documents and Settings\Rui Marto>tracert 82.102.28.193

    Tracing route to 82.102.28.193 over a maximum of 30 hops

    1 8 ms 8 ms 14 ms 10.35.0.1
    2 10 ms 19 ms 6 ms PLM-JBR2001.netvisao.pt [213.228.128.1]
    3 11 ms 19 ms 28 ms 10.251.0.22
    4 15 ms 15 ms 11 ms 192.168.90.1
    5 14 ms 28 ms 26 ms Gigapix.AS31668.Sonet [193.136.250.90]
    6 23 ms 13 ms 23 ms rtr3.core.Lisboa.AS31668.Sonet [82.102.31.195]
    7 15 ms 18 ms 16 ms 82.102.28.193

    Trace complete.

    Netvisão 2048/512Kbps :D
     
  20. WhiteTiger

    WhiteTiger 1st Folding then Sex

    Actividade actual: 104 (75 membros e 29 visitantes)

    Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=139ms TTL=52
    Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=52

    Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 182ms, Average = 98ms

    Mas tenho aqui uma tal de cof...cof...mul@ :P

    adsl.pt 1024/256
     
    Última edição: 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Partilhar esta Página