Socket 939 Motherboard Roundup

Zar0n

Power Member
Socket 939 Motherboard Roundup

Final Words
It was difficult to resist being a little sensationalist in this 939 roundup and titling the review, "Who needs 925X?" That would have been a fair title, however, since you can clearly see that all of the Socket 939/FX53 boards completely outperform Intel's top 560 on the top 925X motherboard. Even Media Encoding, the last bastion of Intel dominance, has fallen in benchmarks with our new AutoGK benchmark.

Any of the Socket 939 motherboards that we tested here would make a great home for a Socket 939 Athlon 64. They all perform very well at stock speed and any of them will serve you well. We even found that all five of the tested motherboards performed at the fastest timings available with both 2 and 4 DIMMs on board, so even that is a non-issue.

However, in this go-round, there are a few criteria that begin to separate the boards that we tested. The two nForce3-250 Ultra motherboards did particularly well in Winstones, outperforming the VIA K8T800 PRO boards in these important benchmarks of overall real-world performance. We also found that the two nF3 boards in this roundup were consistent top performers, and, like other nF3-250 boards that we have tested, are complete with a working PCI/AGP lock for overclocking. This is not a criticism of VIA, because every VIA-based board that we tested in this roundup does indeed have a working lock. However, our concern remains that it sometimes took 2 or 3 revisions to get that working lock on the VIA boards - an issue that we have yet to see on any of the nForce3-250 boards. The good news is we are now confident that VIA has the PCI/AGP lock working, but there are boards floating around without this working feature. Our advice is to be cautious in a VIA purchase if this is an important specification for you. A little time for the market to settle should remove any concerns that you might have in buying a VIA K8T800 PRO chipset 939 or 754.

The ECS is a remarkable step forward for ECS, and we can heartily recommend it as a good value if you plan to run only at stock speeds or you will only need modest overclocking capabilities. It is a very good effort at producing an Enthusiast-level ECS board. However, we think that this board needs to mature a bit more before it turns into a board that will satisfy most enthusiasts. We feel similarly about the MSI K8T Neo2, which was somewhat a surprise as the socket 754 K8T Neo was a favorite. Our concern is based on the fact that we went through 3 K8T Neo2 boards before we got one that really worked. That may just be coincidence, but it raises concern about the quality assurance of this particular product. The final board works very well, and is very fast at stock speed, but it falls well short of the remarkable overclocking capabilities of the sister K8N Neo2. A little time will likely take care of this issue, but we remain cautious for the time being.

Of our top three boards, we can honestly say that any of these 3 would be a great choice. The K8N Neo2 and Gigabyte K8NSNXP are both based on the nForce3-250 Ultra chipset, and the Abit AV8 is very clearly the top of the VIA boards, reaching our second best overclock at 280. However, if you look carefully at the features, performance results, and just plain class in a market segment filled with top performers, the MSI K8N Neo2 stands out.


Based on top performance, the full implementation of the nForce3-250 Ultra features, value, overclocking performance, and flexibility, the MSI K8N Neo2 emerges from a class of top Socket 939 Athlon 64 boards as our Gold Editors Choice. This makes the K8N Neo2 our choice as the best Athlon 64 motherboard that you can buy. MSI has produced two excellent motherboards in a row based on nVidia chipsets for Athlon 64. The K8N Neo for A64 Socket 764 was also one of our top choices for Single-Channel Athlon 64. The K8N Neo2 continues that performance as the top Athlon 64 motherboard that you can buy.


The choice for Silver Editor's Choice is a bit more difficult. We could make arguments for both the nF3-250 Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939 and the VIA K8T880 PRO Abit AV8. However, when we look closely at value, we find the Abit is much cheaper to buy than the Gigabyte, which sways our choice in that direction.


We are extremely pleased to award the Silver Editors Choice for best Athlon 64 Socket 939 motherboard to the Abit AV8. Abit proved to us that you can build an excellent Enthusiast 939 motherboard, and have all the overclocking bells and whistle, with the VIA chipset. The Abit was not a standout in any one area in our tests, but it is a very balanced motherboard with all the Enthusiast features that we have come to expect from Abit motherboards. Abit has worked very hard to reach this level of performance with the VIA chipset, and they have produced a board that is really fun to use.


We know that we will soon be seeing a new revision of the Asus A8V Deluxe, and we also expect to see a DFI nForce3-250 Ultra motherboard designed by a legend in the computer industry. These two new boards, and others that will make their way in the future, will undoubtedly shake up our opinions of what is best. However, that's what makes this industry fun for some and maddening for others - there is always the possibility something better is just around the corner.

Parece que finalmente apos varias revisões as com ***** da Via ja têm todas PCI-lock.

Muito fixes a MSI e a ABIT, pena k o vDIMM fique pela 2.8, no minimo devia ser 3.0.
Mas como perfiro uGuru e o layout tou mais inclinado para a ABIT. Se bem que a MSI tem melhor performance.
E uma kestão decidida pelo o preço.

Mau mau so a INTEL k ja n ganha nenhum bench :004: ainda por cima com uma plataforma muito mais cara.
 
Back
Topo