Votação: Desfragmentadores
- Autor do tópico Rebel_Xz
- Data Início
- Status
Ra7or
Xtreme BOINC
O O&O Defrag é pago?
Cumps normalmente é raro usar desfragmentador hehe mas gostava de experimentar um e parece que esse vai na frente lol
Cumps
Sim! Tens esta versão que é free, no entanto já é datada:
http://www.filehippo.com/download_oo_defrag/
petersaints
Power Member
As poucas vezes que desfragmento o JkDefragGUI faz o trabalho
Use the one provided with Windows.
I tried Diskeeper, and for sure it has finished sooner, but its result is bad - just as nearly all third-party defrags.
To understand it, you must know that putting file fragments together, as third-party softwares do, isn't enough. Windows' Defrag also puts together (since W98) the files that belong to a single application. Compare both with a watch and by listening to the hard drive's arm: Windows' Defrag is better.
About the register: Windows reads it fully to the Ram at bootup, so fragmentation is irrelevant, and writes immediately a full copy of it that will be the new register file.
About the paging file: it is anyway good practice to freeze its size to avoid fragmentation. Reduce it to zero, defragment, and create a fixed-size paging file - it won't move any more.
Windows' Defrag does defragment files currently in use.
More than choosing your defrag software, you can improve things by a sound partition of your hard drive. Put Windows on a (not too) small volume, application on another, and your documents on a third one. Only the Windows volume gets fragmented but doesn't mess up the applications volume, and the Windows volume is quickly defragmented. This small volume, at the beginning of the disk (fastest place) also keeps all pieces of Win close to another, thus reducing arm movements. Next advantage: if formatting the Windows volume, you keep your documents, and some programs stay ready to run.
Use Ntfs - for this reason as well - because Windows' Defrag is much faster on it.
Consolidating free space: Not very important with Ntfs, as it doesn't fragment a file just to use the first available free space. So letting some free space fragmented is a sound time saving.
I defrag about twice a month, it takes me 3 min in such a configuration.
I tried Diskeeper, and for sure it has finished sooner, but its result is bad - just as nearly all third-party defrags.
To understand it, you must know that putting file fragments together, as third-party softwares do, isn't enough. Windows' Defrag also puts together (since W98) the files that belong to a single application. Compare both with a watch and by listening to the hard drive's arm: Windows' Defrag is better.
About the register: Windows reads it fully to the Ram at bootup, so fragmentation is irrelevant, and writes immediately a full copy of it that will be the new register file.
About the paging file: it is anyway good practice to freeze its size to avoid fragmentation. Reduce it to zero, defragment, and create a fixed-size paging file - it won't move any more.
Windows' Defrag does defragment files currently in use.
More than choosing your defrag software, you can improve things by a sound partition of your hard drive. Put Windows on a (not too) small volume, application on another, and your documents on a third one. Only the Windows volume gets fragmented but doesn't mess up the applications volume, and the Windows volume is quickly defragmented. This small volume, at the beginning of the disk (fastest place) also keeps all pieces of Win close to another, thus reducing arm movements. Next advantage: if formatting the Windows volume, you keep your documents, and some programs stay ready to run.
Use Ntfs - for this reason as well - because Windows' Defrag is much faster on it.
Consolidating free space: Not very important with Ntfs, as it doesn't fragment a file just to use the first available free space. So letting some free space fragmented is a sound time saving.
I defrag about twice a month, it takes me 3 min in such a configuration.
José Alberto
Power Member
Quem disse isso?
PanterA
Power Member
No O&O Defrag uso sempre o DEFRAGMENT COMPUTER (que usa o space method). Contudo, existe a opção de desfragmentar com as opções de STEALTH, SPACE, e COMPLETE.
Quais as diferenças? E qual o melhor?
Obrigado
Eu uso sempre a Space! Semanalmente faço uma dessas! E quando vejo que o PC já não vai lá com uma Space, faço um Complete/Acess (que é a mais puxada e demora mais, mas depois fica como novo
)Para saberes mais sobre os tipos de desfrags vais a:
Help --> Open Online Help --> O&O Defrag Methods
Isto tudo dentro do programa!
Qualquer coisa, diz!
||Red_Evil||
Portugal@Home Member
Gabriel_XIV
Power Member
Experimentei ontem pela primeira vez fazer um Complete/Access e isto chegou a dar 1 dia e 8 horas no remaining timeEu uso sempre a Space! Semanalmente faço uma dessas! E quando vejo que o PC já não vai lá com uma Space, faço um Complete/Acess (que é a mais puxada e demora mais, mas depois fica como novo
.Isto é normal acontecer?
ravager
Suspenso
Experimentei ontem pela primeira vez fazer um Complete/Access e isto chegou a dar 1 dia e 8 horas no remaining time
Isto é normal acontecer?
O remaining time nunca é certo, mas não me admirava de tal.
Esse método organiza tudo o que é ficheiros no disco por data da última utilização.
PanterA
Power Member
Experimentei ontem pela primeira vez fazer um Complete/Access e isto chegou a dar 1 dia e 8 horas no remaining time
Isto é normal acontecer?
È muito provável... Então se tiveres um disco minimamente grande, e se a tralha já for muita, é muito provável que isso aconteça.
No no meu outro PC (disco de 500g, e com muito lixo e movimentação de ficheiros), uma dessas demorou-me 2 dias. Mas em compensão, ficou como novo.
Gabriel_XIV
Power Member
Pois! O meu disco tem 250Gb divididos em 2 partições(uma de 177Gb e outra de 55,2Gb), sendo que a maior já só tem 40Gb livres.
Já tentei outra vez e isto vai com um progresso de 25%, faltando apenas umas 16 horas, mas já agora vou até ao fim para ver se isto fica "fino como o aço"
.- Status