Ate semi-avariada da cabo das outras boards todas
Fazer OC na RAM é uma coisa.
Fazer OC na RAM e na CPU é outra...
(e o que estou a ver ali é um X6800 a correr com menos 1.1GHz do que a velocidade em default -2.93GHz-)
Pois se fosses ao xs ler ja sabias o porque. Está board tem cerca de dois meses e o cpu code não está actualizado e não reconhce o X6800. Para uma bios beta e para uma board beta com dois meses até não está nada mau.
Reconhece o multiplicador, cache L2 e velocidade do FSB, é isso que importa para o boot.
Qual é a importância de não reconhecer o nome oficial ou o VCore da CPU ?
Qualquer desses valores pode ser alterado por software no Windows, ou via VoltMod (aliás, o CPU-Z reconhece a string correcta).
a importancia é tal, que causa os problemas que estas a ver com o cpu...
o gajo no XS não arranja um presler, para ver se o cpu é decentemente reconhecido, e se consegue fazer um teste como deve ser?
Os facto de permitir overclock independente das memorias é possitivo, mas, sem oc decentemente o cpu, nao interessa para nada.
now benching my E6700es B1
3.8G , ddr2_1200 4-4-4-4 pi_1m=13.547sec
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=118497&page=2
a dfi so deve ter ca para fora a board a partir de novembro se tudo correr bem...
Vem mesmo a tempo para puxar os Kentsfield
Ou só as memórias DDR2...
VictorWang disse:thx Franck send me an old B47 bios, I moded that bios with Asus' cpupatch,
combine some jumpers, things get crazy
tested a E6700es B1 with Intel Stock Cooler, ambient=28c, vcore=1.45v, vdimm=2.51v. and X1950XTX with Stock cooler. :woot:
pi_1m @ 3.8G , ddr2_1200 4-4-4-4, no optimize at all.
if fact, I've optimized the sub-ram-timings in the bios, ddr2_1066, got a pi_1m=13.531sec @ 3.8G, but seems I forgot to save the screenshot :
doesn't matter, 'coz I'll make it more faster tonight
========================================================
everest memtest
========================================================
3Dmark05 with X1950XTX Single
"RD600" to finally arrive
DailyTech previously reported DFI’s motherboard roadmap which showed DFI’s RD600 based motherboard arriving towards the end of August. Nevertheless, DFI has almost readied its long awaited RD600 motherboard, and a few pictures of the board have already been leaked to DailyTech. The new motherboard will carry DFI’s established LANParty UT branding and cater towards enthusiasts. As previously reported the board is named LANParty UT RD600-T2R/G.
Early images show the LANParty UT RD600-T2R/G with three PCI-Express x16 and three PCI slots. Two PCI Express x16 slots will be full speed with sixteen lanes routed to each slot. The lane configuration on the third slot is unknown, though it most likely has around four lanes like other motherboards equipped with three PCI Express x16 slots. With its three PCI Express x16 slots it appears the DFI LANParty UT RD600-T2R/G is ready for ATI’s triple-play physics for hardware accelerated physics processing.
Other notable features include dual onboard Gigabit Ethernet, UV reactive slots and integrated high definition audio. As with previous LANParty UT motherboards, the LANParty UT RD600-T2R/G uses DFI’s Karajan audio module which moves the audio codec off of the motherboard PCB. This removes some electrical noise often associated with motherboard PCBs.
Expect the DFI LANParty UT RD600-T2R/G to arrive within the next month or two with support for Intel’s Conroe Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme processors. Pricing is unknown at the moment, though expect it to be north of $200. Unfortunately, DFI's RD600 motherboard may be the last ATI-Intel motherboard to see the light of day.