Ping 82.102.28.193 -n 10

P4rthen0n · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

C:\>ping 82.102.28.193 -n 10

A enviar para 82.102.28.193 com 32 bytes de dados:

Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=71ms TTL=52
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=60ms TTL=52
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=60ms TTL=52
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=70ms TTL=52
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=60ms TTL=52
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=80ms TTL=52
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=60ms TTL=52
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=60ms TTL=52
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=60ms TTL=52
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=60ms TTL=52

Estatísticas de ping para 82.102.28.193:
Pacotes: Enviados = 10, Recebidos = 10, Perdidos = 0 (perda: 0%),
Tempo aproximado de ida e volta em milissegundos:
Mínimo = 60ms, Máximo = 80ms, Média = 64ms

adsl.pt 1Mb

zx-9r · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 15ms

nothing · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Netvisão@512 (com a mula ligada)

Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 18ms, Average = 16ms

Cooling · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=57
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 8ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 11ms

Netcabo @ 2MB

Nemesis11 · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Netcabo@2MB

PING 82.102.28.193 (82.102.28.193) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=63.5 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=12.0 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=13.7 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=10.9 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=16.5 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=22.2 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=10.3 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=76.8 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=9.39 ms

WhiteTiger · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Agora sem a tal mul@

Actividade actual: 67 (47 membros e 20 visitantes)

Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 59ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 61ms

adsl.pt 1024/256

[BoB]Marley · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Joao>ping 82.102.28.193 -n 10

Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 66ms, Maximum = 72ms, Average = 68ms

Sapo adsl 512 @ home

[siLciR] · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 43ms, Average = 40ms

novis 4mb/256

Peterwolf · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

~ # ping 82.102.28.193
PING 82.102.28.193 (82.102.28.193): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=56.5 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=56.7 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=57.0 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=56.9 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=59.2 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=57.7 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=57.4 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=7 ttl=52 time=57.2 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=8 ttl=52 time=57.7 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=9 ttl=52 time=55.9 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=10 ttl=52 time=62.1 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=11 ttl=52 time=56.2 ms
64 bytes from 82.102.28.193: icmp_seq=12 ttl=52 time=56.4 ms

--- 82.102.28.193 ping statistics ---
13 packets transmitted, 13 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 55.9/57.4/62.1 ms

~ # traceroute 82.102.28.193
traceroute to 82.102.28.193 (82.102.28.193), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 bl3-16-1.dsl.telepac.pt (213.13.16.1) 13.546 ms 13.479 ms 13.581 ms
2 dial-b1-170-46.telepac.pt (194.65.170.46) 11.545 ms 12.842 ms 11.135 ms
3 lcatrt1.telepac.net (213.13.135.82) 11.493 ms 12.607 ms 11.524 ms
4 falcao.telepac.net (213.13.135.170) 11.433 ms 12.371 ms 11.582 ms
5 194.65.9.2 (194.65.9.2) 12.651 ms 17.994 ms 16.523 ms
6 fa0-0-ar2.lis.router.colt.net (80.251.166.219) 13.717 ms 13.417 ms 13.529 ms
7 80.251.161.178 (80.251.161.178) 55.306 ms 59.846 ms 59.143 ms
8 sonet-gw.cpe.NFSi.pt (82.102.1.38) 55.621 ms 54.709 ms 54.996 ms
9 rtr3.core.lisboa.as31668.sonet (82.102.31.195) 54.826 ms 55.186 ms 55.693 ms
10 82.102.28.193 (82.102.28.193) 55.715 ms 59.643 ms 62.004 ms

Telepac ADSL.PT Mega (1Mbps/256Kbps)

suB · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Netvisao 1024/256

Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 18ms

Raptor · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Também há que ter em conta que agora sem o Google e o Paypal, o forum tem a obrigação de ser bastante mais RÁPIDO.

Chip · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Exacto, Embora Isso Não Deva Afectar O Resultado Dos Pings

Peterwolf · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Sim, a nivel de Ping e Tracert os google ads nada afectam.

O melhoramente dos pings deve-se ao facto de termos passado para um host com infrastruturas nacionais

Bastava ver que para o host americano era sempre acima de 100ms/150ms

Abraços

JC · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

ADSL Novis/CLIX 4MBPS

Código:

Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 29ms, Maximum = 37ms, Average = 33ms

Código:

Tracing route to 82.102.28.193 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    16 ms    23 ms    17 ms  r6613.nr.ip.pt [195.23.0.154]
  2    30 ms    20 ms    19 ms  195-23-31-126.nr.ip.pt [195.23.31.126]
  3    34 ms    25 ms    36 ms  195-23-31-165.nr.ip.pt [195.23.31.165]
  4    37 ms    36 ms    21 ms  194-79-92-73.nr.ip.pt [194.79.92.73]
  5    24 ms    35 ms    23 ms  194-79-92-73.nr.ip.pt [194.79.92.73]
  6    38 ms    23 ms    35 ms  194-79-93-66.nr.ip.pt [194.79.93.66]
  7    31 ms    40 ms    37 ms  Gigapix.AS25137.NFSi [193.136.250.120]
  8    40 ms    38 ms    41 ms  sonet-gw.cpe.NFSi.pt [82.102.1.38]
  9    35 ms    40 ms    39 ms  rtr3.core.lisboa.as31668.sonet [82.102.31.195]
 10    33 ms    41 ms    35 ms  82.102.28.193

Trace complete.

_zZz_ · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 23ms, Average = 18ms

mt bom

wellcome back forum

ElectricFox · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Código:

Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum =  125ms, Average =  45ms

Código:

Tracing route to 82.102.28.193 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1   <10 ms    16 ms   <10 ms  10.6.159.254
  2   <10 ms    16 ms   <10 ms  a212-113-162-126.netcabo.pt [212.113.162.126]
  3    47 ms   <10 ms    15 ms  a212-113-164-165.netcabo.pt [212.113.164.165]
  4   <10 ms    16 ms    15 ms  a212-113-164-129.netcabo.pt [212.113.164.129]
  5    15 ms    16 ms    31 ms  a212-113-160-161.netcabo.pt [212.113.160.161]
  6     *       31 ms    16 ms  Gigapix.AS25137.NFSi [193.136.250.120]
  7    16 ms    15 ms    32 ms  sonet-gw.cpe.NFSi.pt [82.102.1.38]
  8    47 ms    32 ms    78 ms  rtr3.core.Lisboa.AS31668.Sonet [82.102.31.195]
  9    31 ms    31 ms    31 ms  82.102.28.193

Trace complete.

Netcabo SpeedOn 640/128
Testes feitos com a mula ligada.

El sebasti · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Muito melhor agora.

Netvisão@128/128

Microsoft Windows XP [Versão 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

D:\Documents and Settings\_>ping 82.102.28.193 -n 10

A enviar para 82.102.28.193 com 32 bytes de dados:

Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=26ms TTL=59
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=20ms TTL=59
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=22ms TTL=59
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=17ms TTL=59
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=14ms TTL=59
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=17ms TTL=59
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=17ms TTL=59
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=19ms TTL=59
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=19ms TTL=59
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=18ms TTL=59

Estatísticas de ping para 82.102.28.193:
Pacotes: Enviados = 10, Recebidos = 10, Perdidos = 0 (perda: 0%),
Tempo aproximado de ida e volta em milissegundos:
Mínimo = 14ms, Máximo = 26ms, Média = 18ms

JPgod · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Clix Turbo 512

A enviar para 82.102.28.193 com 32 bytes de dados:

Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=25ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=24ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=26ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=24ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=26ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=23ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=23ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=23ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=25ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=23ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=24ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=31ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=25ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=25ms TTL=55
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=23ms TTL=55

Estatísticas de ping para 82.102.28.193:
Pacotes: Enviados = 15, Recebidos = 15, Perdidos = 0 (perda: 0%),
Tempo aproximado de ida e volta em milissegundos:
Mínimo = 23ms, Máximo = 31ms, Média = 24ms

Rastreio da rota para 82.102.28.193 até o máximo de 30 saltos

1 27 ms 26 ms 21 ms 195-23-118-1.nr.ip.pt [195.23.118.1]
2 22 ms 22 ms 21 ms 195-23-118-83.nr.ip.pt [195.23.118.83]
3 23 ms 21 ms 19 ms 195-23-118-58.nr.ip.pt [195.23.118.58]
4 23 ms 21 ms 22 ms 213-205-74-62.nr.ip.pt [213.205.74.62]
5 25 ms 22 ms 22 ms 195-23-31-238.nr.ip.pt [195.23.31.238]
6 23 ms 24 ms 24 ms 195-23-31-238.nr.ip.pt [195.23.31.238]
7 21 ms 22 ms 22 ms 194-79-93-66.nr.ip.pt [194.79.93.66]
8 22 ms 23 ms 23 ms Gigapix.AS25137.NFSi [193.136.250.120]
9 22 ms 22 ms 23 ms sonet-gw.cpe.NFSi.pt [82.102.1.38]
10 30 ms 31 ms 28 ms rtr3.core.Lisboa.AS31668.Sonet [82.102.31.195]
11 31 ms 22 ms 22 ms 82.102.28.193

Rastreio concluído.

ehh isso que é speed :009:

KorbaX · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

C:\>ping 82.102.28.193 -n 10

Pinging 82.102.28.193 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 82.102.28.193:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 81ms, Average = 39ms

FELiYCORA · 12 de Fevereiro de 2005

Clix turbo 512/128 - 154 users online
(ligação com wireless pelo meio)

A enviar para 82.102.28.193 com 32 bytes de dados:

Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=50ms TTL=53
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=40ms TTL=53
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=44ms TTL=53
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=38ms TTL=53
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=40ms TTL=53
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=41ms TTL=53
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=40ms TTL=53
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=38ms TTL=53
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=37ms TTL=53
Resposta de 82.102.28.193: bytes=32 tempo=41ms TTL=53

Estatísticas de ping para 82.102.28.193:
Pacotes: Enviados = 10, Recebidos = 10, Perdidos = 0 (perda: 0%),
Tempo aproximado de ida e volta em milissegundos:
Mínimo = 37ms, Máximo = 50ms, Média = 40ms

Ping 82.102.28.193 -n 10

Power Member

Power Member

Power Member

1st Folding then Sex

Power Member

1st Folding then Sex

To fold or to FOLD?

Power Member

Power Member

Banido

OC Legend

Zwame Advisor

Power Member

Power Member

Professional Folder

I folded Myself

Power Member

Moderador

Power Member

1st Folding then Sex