Ou seja confirma o pior cenário que era o final de 2019, nem que fosse um paper launch.
; ICL HW
iICL11LPGT2Y64 = "Intel(R) UHD Graphics, Gen11 LP"
iICL11LPGT2U64 = "Intel(R) UHD Graphics, Gen11 LP"
iICL11LPGT2U48 = "Intel(R) UHD Graphics, Gen11 LP"
iICL11LPGT2U32 = "Intel(R) UHD Graphics, Gen11 LP"
iICL11LPGT2Y48 = "Intel(R) UHD Graphics, Gen11 LP"
iICL11LPGT2Y32 = "Intel(R) UHD Graphics, Gen11 LP"
iICL11LPGT0 = "Intel(R) UHD Graphics, Gen11 LP"
iICL11LPGT0P5 = "Intel(R) UHD Graphics, Gen11 LP"
; LKF HW
iLKFGT2 = "Intel(R) UHD Graphics, LKF"
iLKFGT0 = "Intel(R) UHD Graphics, LKF"
https://twitter.com/witeken/status/1010282236229357568In other words (if it wasn't entirely clear) according to my source' connections that work at Intel, Intel is now planning to "mostly skip 10nm". (RIP 10nm.)
3:03 PM - 22 Jun 2018
A ideia que tinha lido já à algum tempo é que os 10nm que a Intel tinha investido saiu totalmente errado, que só lançaram um cpu nesse processo manhoso de 10nm às 3 pancadas para não levarem com lawsuits, e que estavam a refazer todo o processo 10nm.Sim, cancelou, aliás a expressão utilizada é "killed off". Isto é especulação mas provavelmente vão apostar tudo nos 7nm por causa da AMD e os 7nm da TSMC...
Media reports published today that Intel is ending work on the 10nm process are untrue. We are making good progress on 10nm. Yields are improving consistent with the timeline we shared during our last earnings report.
Sim, cancelou, aliás a expressão utilizada é "killed off". Isto é especulação mas provavelmente vão apostar tudo nos 7nm por causa da AMD e os 7nm da TSMC...
https://semiaccurate.com/2018/08/02/intel-guts-10nm-to-get-it-out-the-door/What Intel is not telling you, or the analysts, is that the 10nm you may get in late 2019 is not the 10nm they had intended to come out in 2015. More importantly this new process is a significant step backward from the 10nm they promised, as touted in their manufacturing day. How much of a step backwards? Several of SemiAccurate’s moles are saying it is effectively a 12nm process rather than a 10nm process, and the technical changes more than back that claim up. Don’t expect this to ever be publicly admitted to, it is still ’10nm’ and always will be even if the tech doesn’t back that name up.
Tecnicamente já não estão à frente, foram mesmo ultrapassados.Parece me o caminho certo, neste momento estão ah frente no processo de fabrico mesmo que não seja o maior salto do mundo provavelmente mantém se competitivos certamente